On consent of the parties where the respondent assured consideration of the petitioner's claim, the present writ petitions were dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the Court afresh.
Petitions dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the Court afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 220
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
SWP No. 841/2016 IA No. 1/2016 IA No. 2/2016 in WP(C) No. 2396/2019 CM No. 4776/2019 WP (C) No. 1318/2020 CM No. 4112/2020
Mohammad Rashid Chowdhary
.....Appellant/Petitioner(s)
Through :- Mr. Waheed Choudhary, Advocate
v/s
B. G. S. B. U. Rajouri and others
.....Respondent(s)
Through :- Mr. Manik Mahey, Advocate
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents
have assured the petitioner that they would consider the claim of the petitioner.
As such, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the present petitions.
In view of the above, the present petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to the petitioner to approach the Court afresh in the event, grievance of the petitioner remains unsatisfied.
(RAJNESH OSWAL) JUDGE
JAMMU 15.11.2021 Neha
Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No
Mohammad Rashid Chowdhary
B. G. S. B. U. Rajouri
Rajnesh Oswal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
