Single-judge High Court order dismissing petitions for non-prosecution after failing to appear or represent for consecutive hearing dates.
Petition and connected criminal miscellaneous matters dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 9
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CRM(M) No. 38/2020 CrlM No. 63/2020 CrlM No. 64/2020
Mohd. Arshad and others
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
Vs
Union Territory of J&K
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Jamrodh Singh, GA Mr. S. M. Wajahat, Advocate.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
ORDER
There has been no representation on behalf of the petitioners for the
last three dates of hearings and same is the position today also. It seems that the petitioners have lost interest in prosecuting the present petition. As such, the present petition, along with the connected CrlM No. 63/2020 and CrlM No. 64/2020 is, accordingly, dismissed for non prosecution.
(RAJNESH OSWAL) JUDGE
Jammu 12.11.2021 Sahil Padha
Whether the case is speaking: Yes/No. Whether the case is reportable: Yes/No.
Mohd. Arshad and others
Union Territory of J&K
Rajnes Oswal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
