Rahul Kaw v. State Th.Finance Deptt.and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court held that the service dispute is now within the jurisdiction of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jammu Bench, based on specific government notifications, and consequently dismissed the writ petition by transferring it.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition was transferred to the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jammu Bench, with a direction to transmit the case record.
What the court decided
Sr. No. 105
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
SWP No. 45/2015
Rahul Kaw
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs
State of J&K and ors.
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: None
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE ORDER
The present case relates to the service dispute and the same is now amenable to the jurisdiction of Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Jammu Bench in view of Notification No. G.S.R. 267(E) dated 29th April, 2020 read with Notification No. G.S.R. 317(E) dated 28th May, 2020, issued by the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions (Department of Personnel and Training).
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the service dispute arises under the jurisdiction of the Central Administrative Tribunal rather than this High Court.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Rahul Kaw
- respondent
State of J&K and ors.
Coram
Rajnes Oswal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court