The single-judge High Court ordered the transfer of a service dispute writ petition to the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jammu Bench, citing relevant Ministry notifications, directing the Registry to transmit the record.
The writ petition is transferred to the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jammu Bench; record transmission directed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 101
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
SWP No. 19/2015
Majid Rashid Mintoo and anr.
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs
State of J&K and anr.
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: None
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE ORDER
The present case relates to the service dispute and the same is now amenable to the jurisdiction of Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Jammu Bench in view of Notification No. G.S.R. 267(E) dated 29th April, 2020 read with Notification No. G.S.R. 317(E) dated 28th May, 2020, issued by the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions (Department of Personnel and Training).
In view of the above, the instant writ petition is transferred to Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Jammu Bench. Registry shall transmit the record of the case to the CAT, Jammu Bench, which shall deal with the same in accordance with law after issuing notice to both the parties. Registry shall retain soft copy of the writ petition for the purpose of record.
(RAJNESH OSWAL) JUDGE
Jammu 24.09.2021 Karam Chand/Secy.
Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a service dispute is amenable to the jurisdiction of the Central Administrative Tribunal and warrants transfer of a writ petition.
Majid Rashid Mintoo
State of J&K
Rajneesh Oswal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
