The Chief Justice of the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution after no one appeared to press it and the petitioner failed to serve the respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 14
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CJ Court
Case: OWP No. 383 of 2019
Mohd. Yousaf
…Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through: None
V/s
The State of J and K
…. Respondent(s)
Through: None
CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
ORDER
The writ petition has been called out. No one has appeared to press it.
The order sheet reveals that on many occasions the petition was adjourned to await appearance of the counsel for the parties.
The office report indicates that the petitioner has not even taken steps to serve the respondents.
In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, we presume that the petitioner is no longer interested in the matter. It is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution.
(SANJAY DHAR) (PANKAJ MITHAL) JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE
Jammu 06.12.2021 Vijay
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition for non-appearance of the petitioner should be dismissed for want of prosecution.
Mohd. Yousaf
The State of J and K
Sanjay Dhar
Pankaj Mithal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
