CJ Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution, noting the petitioner's non-appearance on previous occasions as an indication of lost interest in the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 7
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CJ Court
Case: OWP No. 1042 of 2013
Janak Dulari
…Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through: None
V/s
State and others
…. Respondent(s)
Through: Sh. S.S Nanda, Sr. AAG
CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
ORDER
The writ petition has been called out. No one appears for the
petitioner. Sh. S.S Nanda, Sr. AAG is present for the respondents.
The order sheet reveals that for last two occasions, no one has appeared for the petitioner.
In view of the above, we presume that the petitioner has lost interest
in the matter. It is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
(SANJAY DHAR) (PANKAJ MITHAL) JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE
Jammu 06.12.2021 Vijay
Janak Dulari
State
Sanjay Dhar
Pankaj Mithal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
