The petitioner requested withdrawal of the petition and connected application. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and vacated any interim directions consequentially.
Petition and connected application dismissed as withdrawn; interim direction vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No.39
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
OW104 No.47/2017 IA No.1/2017
Tahir Haroon Mirza
..Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through :- Mr. Abhishek Kotwal, Advocate.
v/s
Summar Mirza and Others
.....Respondent (s)
Through :- Mr. Ajay Abrol, Advocate for respondent No.1.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
ORDER
07.09.2021
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not
want to press this petition. His statement is taken on record.
In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this
petition along with connected application is, dismissed as withdrawn. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Sanjay Dhar) Judge
Jammu:
07.09.2021 Surinder
Whether the order is reportable? Yes/No Whether the order is speaking? Yes/No
SURINDER KUMAR 2021.09.08 14:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Tahir Haroon Mirza
Summar Mirza
Sanjay Dhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
