Mohd.Hamid v. Lal Hussain
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn on the representation of counsel that the underlying matter has been settled between the parties.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn on the representation of counsel that the underlying matter has been settled between the parties.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 32
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
MA No. 38/2017 IA No. 1/2017
Mohd. Hamid
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. M. A. Bhat, Advocate.
Vs
Lal Hussain
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: None.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, JUDGE
ORDER
08.11.2021
Mr. M. A. Bhat, learned counsel for the appellant, states that matter
has been settled and that he be permitted to withdraw the appeal.
Appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
(Dhiraj Singh Thakur)
Judge
Jammu
08.11.2021
Vishal
Mohd. Hamid
Lal Hussain
Dhiraj Singh Thakur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court