Letters Patent Appeal against dismissal of a writ petition challenging an SSP order. The High Court upheld the impugned order, holding that police must implement existing High Court interim orders preventing land status changes.
Letters Patent Appeal dismissed with no merit found.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 12
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CJ Court
Case: LPA No. 55 of 2019
Raghubir Singh …Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through: Sh. G.S Thakur, Advocate
V/s
State of J and K and others
…. Respondent(s)
Through: Sh. S.S Nanda, Sr. AAG for R-1&2 Sh. R.K.S Thakur, Advocate for R-5
CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
ORDER
‘……….. Meanwhile as ad interim, subject to objections the physical status of the subject land shall not be changed and also no further interest in the land shall be created.’
above interim order of the High Court and to report the matter to the headquarter.
(SANJAY DHAR) (PANKAJ MITHAL) JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE
Jammu 06.12.2021 Vijay
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the police administration has the power to enforce the interim order of the High Court preventing change in physical status of land.
Raghubir Singh
State of Jammu and Kashmir
Sanjay Dhar
Pankaj Mithal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
