The High Court dismissed the writ petition and connected apprehension for lack of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear on recent hearing dates.
Petition and connected IA dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 12 (Regular Cause list)
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CRMC No. 348/2015 IA No. 01/2015
Mohd. Shabir …..Appellant/Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
Vs
Rubeen Khatoon
.…. Respondent(s)
Through:
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
ORDER
02.09.2021
None had caused appearance on behalf of the petitioner on the last
two dates of hearing, last being dated 23.02.2021. Even today, same is the position, which clearly shows that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the matter.
Petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution along with
connected IA.
(Rajnesh Oswal)
Judge
Jammu 02.09.2021
Ram Krishan
Mohd. Shabir
Rubeen Khatoon
RAJNESH OSWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
