The High Court dismissed the writ petition in the interests of justice after the petitioner failed to appear or submit representations on two consecutive hearing dates, indicating a loss of interest in the proceedings.
Petition along with connected application dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No. 14
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CRMC No. 239/2015 IA No. 1/2015
Nazir Ahmed
...Appellant/Petitioner(s)
Through :- None v/s
State of J&K and another
.....Respondent (s)
Through :- Mr. Jamrodh Singh, GA
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
ORDER
There has been no representation on behalf of the petitioner for
the last two consecutive dates of hearing and same is the position today also. It seems that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the present petition.
Hence, the present petition along with connected IA is dismissed
for non-prosecution.
(RAJNESH OSWAL) JUDGE JAMMU 01.09.2021 Neha Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No
NEHA KUMARI 2021.09.01 17:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Nazir Ahmed
State of J&K
Rajnesha Oswal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
