This is a short order regarding a criminal/miscellaneous petition. No representations were made by the petitioners on the hearing dates, indicating a loss of interest in prosecuting the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 20
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CRM(M) No. 125/2020 CrlM No. 307/2020
Vijay Kumar and others
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
Vs
Union Territory of J&K and another
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Jamrodh Singh, GA
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
ORDER
There has been no representation on behalf of the petitioners on the
last dates of hearing and same is the position today also. It seems that the petitioners have lost interest in prosecuting the present petition. As such, the present petition along with the connected CrlM No. 307/2020 is, accordingly
dismissed for non prosecution.
(RAJNESH OSWAL) JUDGE
Jammu
16.11.2021 Sahil Padha
Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No. Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No
Vijay Kumar and others
Union Territory of J&K
Rajnesh Oswal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
