The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed a revision petition as withdrawn, allowing the petitioner liberty as prayed for and vacating any interim directions.
Revision petition dismissed with liberty as prayed; interim directions vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 101
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CR No. 31/2021
CM No. 3032/2021
Sudershan Kumar and another …Petitioner(s)
Through:- Mr. Ashfaq Ahmed Khan, Advocate vice Mr. Rupal Ratta, Advocate.
v/s
Rashpal Singh and others …Respondent(s)
Through:- None.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the application for withdrawal of the revision petition has been filed being CM No. 6340/2021 which is however, not listed.
Record reveals that application has been filed. The same is taken on board.
For the reasons stated in the application, revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for.
Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(JAVED IQBAL WANI)
JUDGE
Jammu 13.08.2021 Renu
RENU BALA 2021.08.16 17:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Sudershan Kumar
Rashpal Singh
JAVED IQBAL WANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
