Ajay Singh v. Hira Lal Abrol
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner failed to appear. Despite prior notice directions, no steps were taken by the petitioner. The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No. 225
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
OW104 No. 118/2015 IA No. 01/2015
Ajay Singh …Petitioner(s)
Through :- None.
V/s
Hira Lal Abrol …Respondent(s)
Through :- None
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE
ORDER
None appeared for the petitioner on the last date of hearing.
Today as well none appears for the petitioner.
Steps also have not been taken ever since the notice was directed to be issued to the respondents by this Court in terms of order dated 27.08.2015, even Dasti notice permitted has also not been served.
The petition, in view of the above, is dismissed for nonprosecution along with connected IA(s).
Interim direction, if any shall stand vacated.
(JAVED IQBAL WANI)
JUDGE
Jammu 12.08.2021 Angita
Ajay Singh
Hira Lal Abrol
Javed Iqbal Wani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court