This single-line order dismissed a contempt petition filed by the appellant, holding that the instant proceedings were rendered infructuous due to the afflux of time.
Contempt petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 87
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
CPOWP No. 40/2015
Syed Abdul Qasim
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Aftab Malik, Advocate
Vs
Muktesh K. Pardeshi and another
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: None.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PUNEET GUPTA, JUDGE ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with the afflux of
time the instant contempt petition has been rendered infructuous.
The instant contempt petition is, accordingly, dismissed as having
been rendered infructuous.
Jammu 13.12.2021 Shammi
(Puneet Gupta) Judge
Syed Abdul Qasim
Muktesh K. Pardeshi and another
Puneet Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
