In this contempt proceeding, the petitioner's counsel stated that prior directions were complied with, leading the court to close the proceedings without further analysis.
Contempt proceeding closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No.20
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CJ Court
CCP(D) No.10/2019
Ghulam Ahmad Mir
…Petitioner(s)/Appellants.
Through: Mr. S. H. Thakur, Advocate.
Vs.
G. M. Dar and others.
….Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Sajad Ashraf, GA.
CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE
O R D E R 14.09.2021
Mr. S. H. Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the directions of the court have been duly complied with and, as such, he does not want to press this contempt petition.
In view of the above, the contempt proceeding are closed.
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL) (PANKAJ MITHAL) JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE
Srinagar
14.09.2021
Abdul Qayoom, PS
ABDUL QAYOOM LONE 2021.09.15 10:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Ghulam Ahmad Mir
G. M. Dar
Vinod Chatterji
Koul
Pankaj Mithal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
