The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed a petition seeking sanction of pension on the basis of first listed due to failure of petitioner(s) to appear for hearing.
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 04
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CJ Court
SWP No. 1196/2008
Mohammad Tariq Buch & Anr.
…Petitioner(s)/Appellants.
Through: None.
Vs.
State of J&K & Others.
….Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. M. I. Qadri, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Naveed Gul, Advocate. Ms. Masooda Jan, Advocate (R-4)
CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE
O R D E R 13.09.2021
The writ petition relates to sanction of pension to the petitioners, considering their pay fixation in terms of SRO 259 of 2007. No one is turning up to press this petition. The writ petition has been called out but none has appeared on behalf of the petitioners. Shri M. I. Qadri, Sr. Advocate, assisted by Mr. Naveed Gul and Ms. Masooda Jan, Advocate are present for the respondents.
In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL) (PANKAJ MITHAL) JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE
Srinagar
13.09.2021
“Abdul Rashid”
ABDUL RASHID GANAI 2021.09.14 03:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Mohammad Tariq Buch & Anr.
State of J&K & Others.
Vinod Chatterji Koul
Pankaj Mithal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
