Petitioner challenged a detention order. Respondent submitted the detenu was released on 07.06.2020. Court held petition infructuous and dismissed it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 736 Final hearing
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT SRINAGAR
(Through Virtual Mode)
WP(Crl.) No. 304/2019
Sameer Ahmad Bhat
…. Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through:Mr. Wajid Haseeb, Advocate
V/s
State of J&K and anr.
…..Respondent(s)
Through:Mr. Mir Suhail, A.A.G
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE
ORDER
Mr. Mir Suhail, learned AAG appearing on behalf of the respondents, submits that the detention order has been revoked and the detenu has been released from the custody on 07.06.2020, therefore, nothing survives for consideration in this petition. His statement is taken on record.
Mr. Wajid Haseeb, learned counsel for the petitioner, has no objection, in case this petition is dismissed on the aforesaid count.
In view of the aforesaid submissions, this petition has become infructuous and is, accordingly, dismissed alongwith connected application(s), if any.
(Sindhu Sharma) Judge
SRINAGAR
02.07.2020 Ram Murti
Whether the order is speaking : Yes/No. Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No
Sameer Ahmad Bhat
State of J&K
Sindhu Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
