The High Court of Jammu and Kashmir dismissed a writ petition (WP(C) No. 2691/2019) because the petitioners failed to appear and were deemed to have lost interest in pursuing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No. 213
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT SRINAGAR
(Through Video Conference)
WP(C) No. 2691/2019 CM No. 5268/2019
Abdul Rahim Rather and anr.
...Petitioners(s)
Through :- None V/s
State of J&K and others
.....Respondent (s)
Through :- Ms. Saba Gulzar, Advocate vice Mr. B. A. Dar, Sr. AAG ( on video call)
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
(through Video Conference from residence in Jammu)
ORDER 07.10.2020
On the previous date of hearing also there was no representation on
behalf of the petitioners. In the interest of justice, the matter was adjourned. Today also, there is no representation on their behalf. It seems that the petitioners
have lost interest in prosecution of this writ petition. The same is, accordingly, dismissed along with connected IA.
(RAJNESH OSWAL) JUDGE
JAMMU 07.10.2020 Rakesh
Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No
RAKESH KUMAR 2020.10.08 11:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Abdul Rahim Rather
State of J&K
RajNesh Oswal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
