The court allowed an application for condonation of a 179-day delay in filing an appeal, disposing of the application and directing the registry to diarize and list the appeal.
Condoned 179 days delay and allowed the application to file the appeal. Registry to diarize and list the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No. 219
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT SRINAGAR
(Through Video Conference)
CONCR No. 2/2019 [CrlM No. 20/2019]
State
...petitioner (s)
Through :- Ms. Saba Gulzar, Advocate vice Mr. B. A. Dar, Sr. AAG ( on video call)
V/s
Bashir Ahmad Bhat
.....Respondent (s)
Through :- Ms. Jaisia Ali, Advocate vice Mr. Syed Faizal Qadri, Advocate (on video call)
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE (through Video Conference from residence in Jammu)
ORDER 06.10.2020
This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 179 days in
filing appeal.
For the reason stated in the application, the same is allowed and
delay of 179 days in filing the appeal is condoned.
Condonation application is disposed of.
Registry to diarize the appeal and list the same in due course.
(RAJNESH OSWAL)
JUDGE
JAMMU
06.10.2020 Rakesh
RAKESH KUMAR 2020.10.07 11:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the condition for condonation of delay of 179 days in filing an appeal was satisfied.
State
Bashir Ahmad Bhat
RAJNESH OSWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
