High Court at Jammu dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution after petitioner counsel noted no threat to life and liberty.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 111
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 1388/2020 CM Nos. 4441 & 4614/2020 (Through Video Conferencing)
Manpreet Kour and another …Petitioner(s)
Through:- Mr. Ravinder Parihar, Advocate
v/s
Union Territory of J&K and others ….Respondent(s)
Through:-
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE
ORDER
have not contacted him after filing of the present petition. Apparently, they are
not facing any threat to their life and liberty.
(RAJESH BINDAL)
JUDGE
CHANDIGARH
01.10.2020
SUNIL-I
Whether the order is speaking : Yes/No Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No
PARAMJEET SINGH 2020.10.01 18:10 I am approving this document
Manpreet Kour
Union Territory of J&K
RAJESH BINDAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
