The writ petitioner sought age relaxation for government recruitment based on an old service period. After a decade of inactivity, the Court found the matter had no effect and dismissed the petition as infructuous.
The petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 312
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
SWP No. 620/2008 (O&M) (Through Video Conferencing)
Kulbir Singh …Petitioner(s)
Through:-
v/s
State of J&K and others ….Respondent(s)
Through:-
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE
ORDER
year 2008, seeking a direction to the respondents to treat the petitioner to be in
service for the purpose of age relaxation for recruitment in government service by extending the benefit of Government Order No. 102-GAD of 2007, dated 27.01.2007.
2 SWP No. 620/2008
decade as the same was last listed in Court on 17.07.2008, nothing survives therein, at this stage.
Kumari vs. State of J&K and others .
| ( |
RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE |
|
|---|---|---|
| JAMMU | ||
| 08.10.2020 | ||
| SUNIL-I | ||
| Whether the order is speaking | : Yes/No |
|
| Whether the order is reportable | : Yes/No |
SUNIL KUMAR 2020.10.13 13:28 I am approving this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition filed in 2008 seeking age relaxation for recruitment still survives for disposal over a decade later.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Santosh Kumari vs. State of J&K and othersReferred¶19
SWP No. 2374/2002, Santosh Kumari vs. State of J&K and others
Kulbir Singh
State of J&K
RAJESH BINDAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
