The Single Writ Bench transferred a service dispute by a J&K employee to the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jammu Bench, based on executive notifications conferring such jurisdiction.
The record of the present case is transferred to the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jammu Bench.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 300
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
SWP No. 553/2008
Shaheen Anjum …Petitioner(s)
v/s
State of J&K and others ...Respondent(s)
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE
ORDER
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE Jammu 08.10.2020 Meenakshi Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No. Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No.
MEENAKSHI DEVI 2020.10.19 13:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
2 issues framed by the court
whether the writ petition should be allowed or transferred to the Central Administrative Tribunal
whether the jurisdiction to decide service disputes of Union Territories employees lies with the High Court or the Tribunal
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Shaheen Anjum
State of J&K
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
