This order discusses the transfer of a service dispute writ petition to the Central Administrative Tribunal based on notifications conferring jurisdiction on the Tribunal for Union Territories of J&K and Ladakh.
The record of the present case is transferred to CAT, Jammu Bench, retaining a soft copy for record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No. 420 Supplementary-1 List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
SWP No. 48/2009 (O & M)
Farooq Ahmed Mir and Ors. …..Petitioner(s)
V/s
State of J&K and Ors. ….. Respondent(s)
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE
ORDER
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
JAMMU 21.09.2020 “Manzoor” Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No. Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No.
MANZOOR UL HASSAN DAR 2020.10.07 11:22
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition regarding service disputes of employees of Union Territories of J&K falls within the jurisdiction of the High Court or the Central Administrative Tribunal.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Farooq Ahmed Mir and Ors.
State of J&K and Ors.
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
