The High Court of Jammu and Kashmir observed that jurisdiction over service disputes of Union Territory employees lies with the Central Administrative Tribunal. The court ordered transfer of the record to CAT, Jammu Bench.
Transfer of the record of the present case to the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jammu Bench.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No. 1045 Supplementary-1 List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
SWP No. 22/2009
Rakesh Singh …..Petitioner(s)
V/s
State of J&K and Ors.
….. Respondent(s)
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE
ORDER
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE JAMMU 21.09.2020 “Manzoor” Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No. Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No.
MANZOOR UL HASSAN DAR 2020.10.07 11:21
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the service dispute of Union Territory employees falls under the jurisdiction of the Central Administrative Tribunal.
Whether the record of the writ petition should be transferred to CAT, Jammu Bench.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rakesh Singh
State of J&K
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
