Dismissed
Inderjit Singh v. State Th.Edu.Deptt. and Anr.
J&K HCSWP/310/2009
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Single line order declaring a writ petition infructuous without substantive reasoning.
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 97
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
SWP No. 310/2009 (O & M)
(Through Audio Calling)
Inderjeet Singh …Petitioner(s)
Through:- Mr. Sudershan Sharma, Advocate. (Through Audio Call, 9419127675)
v/s
State of J&K and another ….Respondent(s)
Through:- None.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayer
made in the present petition has been rendered infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
Jammu 19.06.2020 Vijay Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No. Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No.
VIJAY KUMAR 2020.06.25 13:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Inderjeet Singh
State of J&K
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court