Petitioner filed a writ petition. Counsel submitted that the prayer has become infructuous. The court ordered accordingly, leaving the underlying matter disposed of by the previous adjudication.
Petition disposed on the ground that the prayer therein was infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 3 Supl.3
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
OWP No. 955/2014 (O & M)
(Through Audio Calling)
Javid Iqbal …Petitioner(s)
Through:- Mr. I. H. Bhat, Advocate (Through Audio Call, 9622240786) v/s
State of J&K and others ….Respondent(s)
Through:- None.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayer
made in the present petition has been rendered infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
Jammu 11.06.2020 Vijay Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No. Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No.
VIJAY KUMAR 2020.06.17 15:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Javid Iqbal
State of J&K
RAJESH BINDAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
