The High Court of Jammu and Kashmir dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. There is no substantive judgment or reasoning provided.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn. Interim direction vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 208
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
(Through Video Conferencing at Jammu)
OWP No. 852/2013 IA No. 1179/2013
M/S Sarfaraz Rice General Mills and others …Petitioner(s)
Through:- Mr. Intikhab H Shah, Advocate.
v/s
Union of India and others ….Respondent(s)
Through:- None.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of the
petition. Permitted. Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Interim direction if any shall stand vacated.
(JAVED IQBAL WANI)
JUDGE
Jammu
05.12.2020 Renu
RENU BALA 2020.12.09 12:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
M/S Sarfaraz Rice General Mills and others
Union of India and others
JAVID IQBAL WANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
