Himmat Singh v. Gurmeet Singh
Case brief
What is this about?
232 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU…
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as not pressed; interim direction vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 232
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
(Through Video Conferencing)
CPOWP 28/2013
Himmat Singh
.... Petitioner(s)
Through: - Mr. B. S. Manhas, Advocate
v/s
Gurmeet Singh
…. Respondent(s)
Through:- None
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE
ORDER
contempt petition has been rendered infructuous, as such, petitioner does not want to press the same.
(JAVED IQBAL WANI) JUDGE
Jammu 09.12.2020 Bir
BIR BAHADUR SINGH 2020.12.11 15:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Himmat Singh
Gurmeet Singh
JAVED IQBAL WANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court