Writ petition seeking direction not to cancel regularization of a plot. Dismissed as infructuous due to petitioner and counsel's death and settlement of family dispute.
Petition dismissed as infructuous with liberty to legal representatives to revive within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 209
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
OWP No. 839/2009 (O&M) (Through Video Conferencing)
Raghubir Singh …Petitioner(s)
Through:-
v/s
State of J&K and others ….Respondent(s)
Through:- Mr. G.S. Thakur, Advocate
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE
ORDER
2 OWP No. 839/2009
petitioner to get the same revived within a period of three months from the date of this order, if anything survives in the present petition.
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
JAMMU 12.10.2020 SUNIL-I
Whether the order is speaking : Yes/No Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No
SUNIL KUMAR 2020.10.15 15:35 I agree to specified portions of this document
Raghubir Singh
State of J&K
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
