In this contempt petition filed in 2009 regarding non-compliance of an order passed in 2008, the court dismissed the matter due to the petitioner's prolonged absence and failure to appear at multiple subsequent hearings between 2010 and 2020.
The contempt petition was dismissed on the basis of the petitioner's silence and continued absence from hearings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 206
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
CPSW No. 85/2009 (O&M) (Through Video Conferencing)
Priscilia …Petitioner(s)
Through:-
v/s
N.K. Verma and others ….Respondent(s)
Through:-
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE
ORDER
2 CPSW No. 85/2009
listing of their cases. For which specific note is being published in the Cause List. But despite this, none of the counsel has shown any interest.
(RAJESH BINDAL)
JUDGE
JAMMU
12.10.2020
SUNIL-I
Whether the order is speaking : Yes/No
Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No
SUNIL KUMAR 2020.10.15 15:35 I agree to specified portions of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's silence and absence from hearings for over a decade demonstrates that the underlying grievance regarding non-compliance of an order survives.
Priscilia
N.K. Verma and others
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
