This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 208
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
(Through Video Conference)
OWP No. 802/2007 IA No. 1161/2007
Paramjit Singh …Petitioner(s)
Through:- Mr. Sumeer Pandita, Advocate (through voice call from residence) v/s
State of J&K and others ….Respondent(s)
Through:- None.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ
petition has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed.
In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the
petitioner, this petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL) JAMMU JUDGE 15.07.2020
Rakesh
Whether the order is speaking? : Yes/No Whether the order is reportable? : Yes/No
RAKESH KUMAR 2020.07.16 10:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Paramjit Singh
State of J&K
VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
