In W.P. No. 152/2011, a prayer in the writ petition was declared infructuous due to the lapse of time. The court ordered accordingly without providing substantive reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 147 After notice cause list
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
OWP No. 152/2011 (O & M)
(Through Audio Calling)
R. B. Educational Trust and anr. …Petitioner(s)
Through:- Mrs. Garima Gupta, Advocate (Through Audio Call, 9419173726)
v/s
State of J&K & others ….Respondent(s)
Through:-
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that with the lapse of
time, the prayer made in the present petition has been rendered infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
(RAJESH BINDAL)
JUDGE
Jammu 23.06.2020
Paramjeet
Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No. Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No.
PARAMJEET SINGH 2020.08.04 14:13 I am approving this document
R. B. Educational Trust and anr.
State of J&K and others
RAJESH BINDAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
