Suriya Begum v. State Th.Social Welfare Deptt.and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 212
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
(Through Video Conference)
OWP No. 1000/2011
IA No. 1353/2011
Suriya Begum ….Petitioner(s)
Through:- Mr. O. P. Thakur, Advocate (through voice call from residence) v/s
State of J&K and others ….Respondent(s)
Through:- Mr. S. S. Nanda, Sr. AAG (through video call from residence) Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ
petition has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed.
In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the
petitioner, this petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL)
JUDGE
JAMMU 10.07.2020 Pawan Angotra
Whether the order is speaking? : Yes/No Whether the order is reportable? : Yes/No
PAWAN ANGOTRA 2020.07.13 15:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Suriya Begum
State of J&K
Vinod Chatterji Koul
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court