This order dismisses a writ petition as infructuous because the respondent counsel stated the case has been closed and only a closure report needs to be filed before the competent court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 228 After Notice
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU (THROUGH VIRTUAL MODE)
CRM(M) No. 659/2019 CrlM No. 1543/2019
Nasreen Akhter and anr.
.....Petitioner(s)
Through :- Mr. Lawanya Sharma, Advocate. .
V/s
UT of J&K
.....Respondent(s)
Through :- Mr. A.M Malik, Dy. A.G
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
ORDER
Learned counsel for the respondent has, upon receipt of instructions, made a statement that the case has been closed and only the closure report is to be filed before the competent Court.
In view of the above, the petition has been rendered infructuous the same is dismissed.
Disposed of, accordingly.
(SANJAY DHAR)
JUDGE
Jammu
11.11.2020 Tarun
TARUN KUMAR GUPTA 2020.11.12 14:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Nasreen Akhter and anr.
UT of J&K
SANJAY DHAR
TARUN KUMAR GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
