Single-order disposal of a contempt petition noting the petitioner's grievance does not survive a subsequent administrative order by the Deputy Accountant General.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 285
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
CCP(S) No. 37/2020 (Through Video Conferencing)
Mohd Iqbal Wani …Petitioner(s)
Through:- Mr. Ajay Bakshi, Advocate
v/s
Shourjou Chatterjee, Accountant General, Jammu ….Respondent(s)
Through:- Mr. Vishal Sharma, ASGI
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the grievance
raised by the petitioner in the present Contempt Petition does not survive in
view of the order dated 07.08.2020 passed by the Deputy Accountant General (Pension).
Ordered accordingly.
(RAJESH BINDAL)
JUDGE
Jammu 07.10.2020 Vijay Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No. Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No
VIJAY KUMAR 2020.10.09 15:48 I agree to specified portions of this document
Mohd Iqbal Wani
Shourjou Chatterjee
RAJESH BINDAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
