This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 221 After Notice
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU (THROUGH VIRTUAL MODE)
BA No. 48/2019 [Bail App No. 48/2019] CrlM No. 110/2020
Vinod Kumar Through :- Mr. Prince Khanna, Advocate.
.....Appellant(s)
V/s
State and anr.
.....Respondent(s)
Through :- None
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this application. His statement is taken on record. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
(SANJAY DHAR) JUDGE
Jammu 09.11.2020 Tarun Whether the order is speaking? Yes/No Whether the order is reportable? Yes/No
TARUN KUMAR GUPTA 2020.11.10 10:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Vinod Kumar
State and anr
Sanjay Dhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
