Vinod Kumar v. State of Hp and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Orally disposed writ petition (CWP No.9371 of 2026, High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla, decided 22 June 2026): Competent Authority directed to decide petitioner Vinod Kumar’s representation (Annexure P-3) within twelve weeks; single judge Ajay Mohan Goel; petitioner represented by Sourav Sharma and Rocky, respondents by Additional Advocate General Pushpinder Jaswal; no statute or precedent discussed; no quantum involved.
What did the court decide?
Direction that the Competent Authority decide the petitioner’s representation (Annexure P-3) within twelve weeks from today, in terms of its contents; pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of. ¶11