Dharam Pal v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla - CWP No. 1824 of 2012 (Sh. Dharam Pal vs State of Himachal Pradesh and others), decided 20.06.2026 by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel. Writ petition dismissed as infructuous on the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that with the passage of time it had lost its efficacy; pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, disposed of accordingly. No merits adjudication; no statutes or precedents cited. Counsel: Ms. Shivani Priya vice Mr. Vikrant Thakur for petitioner; Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General for respondents-State; Mr. Prem P. Chauhan for respondents No. 5 and 6.
What did the court decide?
With the passage of time the writ petition had lost its efficacy and been rendered infructuous; the Court accordingly dismissed the petition as infructuous and disposed of pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, accordingly.