Disposed¶26

Vas Dev v. Hrtc and Others

Himachal Pradesh HC18 Jun 2026CWP/9240/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CWP No.9240/2026, High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla (Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J.), decided 18.06.2026 — Vas Dev v. H.R.T.C and others: retired HRTC Yardmaster sought direction to pay ACPS 4-9-14 arrears of Rs. 2,19,323/- with interest; HRTC office instructions admitted Rs. 66,989/- (old pay scale) payable by 23.06.2026 and Rs. 1,50,974/- (new pay scale) payable later; petition withdrawn with liberty to seek appropriate remedy for surviving grievance; disposed of as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law for redressal of his surviving grievance at an appropriate stage, if necessity so arises. ¶26

Vas Dev Vs Hrtc and Others — Himachal Pradesh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

¶3

CWP No.9240/2026 Decided on:18.06.2026

¶4

Vas Dev …..Petitioner

Versus

H.R.T.C and others

..Respondents

------------------------------------------------------------------------Coram

¶9

Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?¹

¶10

For the Petitioner: Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate.

¶11

For the Respondents: Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate.

¶12

------------------------------------------------------------------------Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge

¶13

Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned counsel,

¶14

appears and waives service of notice on behalf of respondents.

¶15

2. This writ petition has been filed for grant of following substantive relief:-

¶16

“(i). That the respondents may kindly be directed to pay the Arrear of ACPS 4-9-14 which has been duly calculated to the tune of ₹2,19,323/- to the petitioner alongwith up to date interest.”

¶17

3. Learned counsel for the respondent- HRTC has

¶18

placed on record office instructions conveying as under:-

¶19

“In this context, it is intimated that Sh. Vas Dev, Yardmaster retired on 28.02.2023 from HRTC Dehra Unit. The pay fixation arrear has been prepared from 27.08.2009 to 31.12.2015 as per old pay scale for amounting ₹66,989/- and according to new pay scale from 01.01.2016 to 31.05.2022

¶20

1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.

¶21

¶22

for amounting to ₹1,50,974/- (it will be paid when the arrear of new pay scale will be paid). Therefore, the payable amount is ₹66,989/according to the old pay scale and it will be paid upto 23.06.2026. It is therefore, requested may kindly release the drawing limit for ₹66,989/-.”

¶23

Learned counsel submits that admitted

¶24

payment admissible to the petitioner at this stage in terms of aforesaid office instructions shall be released in his favour by 23.06.2026.

¶25

4. In view of aforesaid office instructions and submission made by learned counsel for the respondents, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition at this stage with liberty reserved to him to seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law for redressal of his surviving grievance at an appropriate stage in case necessity so arises.

¶26

Granting such permission, petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

¶27

Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge

¶28

June 18, 2026 yogesh

Vas Dev v. Hrtc and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vas Dev v. Hrtc and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abhishek Gautam Vs UOI and Others

Ashok Tiwari Vs Hp University

Vikas Madan and Another Vs the State of Hp and Others

Pyare Lal Vs Hptdcl and Others

Ramesh Kumar Vs State of Hp and Others

Sanjay Kalia aged about 53 years, Son of Shri Madan Lal, Vs State of Hp and Others