In a Common WPMe petition, the Court held a Coordinate Bench judgment controlling and directed respondents to consider petitioners' representations expeditiously within six weeks, recording an opportunity for hearing.
Direction to consider petitioners' representations in light of Mohit Sharma judgment within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.367 of 2026 Date of Decision: 06.01.2026
_____________________________________________________________________ Parveen Pathania & Ors. ……...Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioners: Mr. Surender K. Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General. ___________________________________________________________________________
Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)
Before reply, if any, from the respondents could be received, learned counsel representing the petitioners, while inviting attention of this Court to judgment passed by Coordinate Bench this Court in CWP No.1638 of 2024 titled Mohit Sharma & Anr. Vs. State
of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. , states that issue raised in the instant proceedings already stands adjudicated by Coordinate Bench of this Court in Mohit Sharma ( supra ) and as such, petitioners would be content and satisfied in case directions are issued to the respondents to consider the representations of the petitioners in light of aforesaid judgment in a time bound manner.
2
not averse to aforesaid innocuous prayer made on behalf of the petitioners.
January 06, 2026 (sunil)
(Sandeep Sharma), Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents should be directed to consider petitioners' representations in light of Coordinate Bench judgment in a time-bound manner.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Mohit Sharma & Anr. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors.Referred¶5
CWP No.1638 of 2024
Parveen Pathania & Ors.
State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors.
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
