Allowed¶13

Anmol Garg v. the State of Hp and Others

Himachal Pradesh HC2 Jan 2026CWP/20825/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Higher stage of pay Rs.31,200 for JOA(IT) on completing two years of regular service; regularization from contractual appointment; notification dated 06.09.2022 amending Revised Pay Rules 2022; petition covered by Mohit Sharma & Anr. v. State of Himachal Pradesh (CWP No.1638 of 2024); mandamus to State of H.P. to release revised pay within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Release of higher stage of pay of Rs.31,200/- to the petitioner w.e.f. completion of two years of regular service as JOA(IT), within four weeks; pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also disposed of. ¶13

Anmol Garg Vs the State of Hp and Others — Himachal Pradesh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

¶2

CWP No.20825 of 2025

¶3

Date of Decision: 02.01.2026

¶4

_______________________________ Anmol Garg Versus	________	____________ …….Petitio	____ ners
State of Himachal Pradesh & others		… Respond	ents
_______________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma Whether approved for reporting?¹	________ , Judge.	____________	____
For the Petitioner : Ms. Muskan, Advocate.	Advocate	vie Ms.Anita	Devi,
For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan General with Anish Banshtu	Kahol, A Mr. Ravi , Deputy A	dditional Adv Chauhan an dvocate Gene	ocate d Mr. rals.
_____________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral):	________	___________	____

¶5

Notice. Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate

¶6

General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.

¶7

Petitioner seeks higher stage of pay, i.e. Rs.31,200/-, on completion of two years of regular service as JOA(IT) in accordance with notification dated 06.09.2022.

¶8

Petitioner was appointed as JOA(IT) on contract basis in the respondent-department on 17.08.2021 (Annexure P-1). His services were regularized on 07.11.2023 (Annexure P-2). On being

¶9

appointed on regular basis on 07.11.2023, petitioner was placed in

¶10

1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

¶11

¶12

the pay-scale of Rs.20, 600/-. Petitioner claim for Rs.31, 200/- on completion of two years of regular service on the strength of notification dated 06.09.2022, amending Revised Pay Rules 2022, is covered under the decision rendered in CWP No.1638 of 2024 titled as Mohit Sharma & Anr. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. Since, the present petition is covered in view of law laid down in the said case, therefore, there is no necessity for calling the reply.

¶13

This writ petition is accordingly allowed. Respondents are directed to release the higher stage of pay of Rs.31, 200/- to the petitioner w.e.f. his completing two years of regular service as JOA (IT). This to be done within four weeks from today. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, to also stand disposed of.

¶14

(Sandeep Sharma), Judge

¶15

January 02,2026 (shankar)

Anmol Garg v. the State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anmol Garg v. the State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shashi Bala Vs State of Hp and Others

Niraj Kumar Vs the Jogindra Central Cooperative Bank Ltd. and Another

Narayan Singh Vs Amarjeet K Sharma

Vijay Kumar Vs the State of Hp and Others

Anupam Sharma Vs the State of Hp and Others

Roshan Lal Vs the Hrtc and Others