The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the writ petition as infructuous due to the efflux of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 15999 of 2025 Decided on: 19.06.2026
Chaman Lal …..Petitioner
Versus
Deputy Commissioner and others ..Respondents
Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1
For the Petitioner: Mr. Anuj Gupta, Advocate. For the Respondents: Ms. Menka Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General.
------------------------------------------------------------------------Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with the efflux of time, this writ petition has rendered infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua June 19, 2026 Judge yogesh
1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.
Chaman Lal
Deputy Commissioner and others
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
