Writ petition disposed of on the basis that the issue raised was squarely covered by the court's earlier decision in Vijay Parmar & Ors., with those directions applied mutatis mutandis, subject to the State's right to assail that judgment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2026:HHC:11517
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.1484 of 2026 Decided on : 10.04.2026
Chander Shekhar
Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and other
Respondents.
Coram
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner: Mr. Abhinav Purohit, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 & 2.
Mr. Rangil Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.3
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (oral)
The Court stands informed that the issue raised by the petitioner herein, is squarely covered by the judgment passed by this Court in CWP No. 9321 of 2025, titled Vijay Parmar & Ors. Vs. State of H.P., decided on 06.04.2026. 2. This could not be disputed on behalf of the respondents-Department, though learned Assistant Advocate General submitted that any order passed in these petitions shall be subject to the right of the State to assail the judgment
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
passed by this Court in Vijay Parmar & Ors. Vs. State of H.P (supra) . Ordered accordingly.
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge
April 10, 2026 (mamta)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's issue is covered by the judgment in Vijay Parmar & Ors. Vs. State of H.P.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Vijay Parmar & Ors. Vs. State of H.P.Applied
CWP No. 9321 of 2025
Chander Shekhar
State of Himachal Pradesh
Ajay Mohan Goel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
