Writ petition withdrawn at the petitioner's request with liberty to pursue any available appropriate remedy. Interim orders vacated and pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.13328 of 2024 Date of Decision: 13.7.2026
____________________________________________________________ Man Mohan Malik
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and Others
…….Petitioner ….Respondents
____________________________________________________________ Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Bimal Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Komal Chaudhary, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan and Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for the State. Mr. Ashok K. Tyagi, Advocate, for respondent No.4. Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for respondent No.5.
____________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral):
Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks
permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to take recourse to appropriate remedy, if any, available.
(Sandeep Sharma), Judge
July 13, 2026 manjit
1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Man Mohan Malik
State of Himachal Pradesh
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
