Disposed¶9

Arjun Lather and Others v. State of Hp and Others

Himachal Pradesh HC13 Jul 2026CRMMO/283/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Cr.MMO No. 283 of 2025, Arjun Lather and Others v. State of H.P. and Another, High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla, decided 13.07.2026 by Sandeep Sharma, J. Petition disposed of as infructuous due to subsequent developments; protective observation that Annexure P-3 order, passed without opportunity of hearing to petitioners, carries no weight in other proceedings initiated at the behest of the respondent.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of as infructuous on account of subsequent developments, with an observation that the impugned order (Annexure P-3), passed without hearing the petitioners, shall have no bearing in any other proceedings initiated at the behest of the respondent. ¶9

Arjun Lather and Others Vs State of Hp and Others — Himachal Pradesh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

¶2

Cr.MMO No. 283 of 2025 Date of Decision: 13.07.2026

¶3

_________________________________ Arjun Lather and Others	_________________ Versus	________________________ ……...Petitioners
State of H.P. and Another		…....Respondents
Coram

¶4

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge.

¶5

Whether approved for reporting?¹

¶6

__________________________________________________________________________ For the Petitioners: Mr. Sunny Rawat, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan and Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for State. Mr. Karan Singh Parmar, Advocate, for respondent No.3. _________________________________________________________________________________

¶7

Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)

¶8

Learned counsel representing the petitioners fairly states that on

¶9

account of subsequent developments, present petition has rendered infructuous and same can be disposed of accordingly. Ordered accordingly. 2. However, before parting, this Court wishes to observe that since order laid challenge in the instant proceedings (Annexure P-3) was passed at the back of petitioners and no opportunity, if any, of hearing was granted to them, same shall have no bearing in any other proceedings initiated at the behest of respondent.

¶10

July 13, 2026 (Sandeep Sharma), Rajeev Raturi Judge

¶11

1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.

Arjun Lather and Others v. State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arjun Lather and Others v. State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raman Kumar Vs State of Hp

M/s Crystal Pharmaceuticals Vs State of Hp

Parvej Vs Hpmfdc

Man Mohan Malik Vs the State of Hp and Others

Gopal Singh Vs Hp State Co-Operative Agriculture and Rural Development Bank Ltd. and Another

Raj Kumar Vs State of Hp