Dismissed¶13

Vijay Kaushal v. Narinder Kumar

Himachal Pradesh HC18 Jul 2026CR.A/57/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Vijay Kaushal v. Narinder Kumar & Anr.; Cr. Appeal No. 57 of 2014; High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla; decision dated 18.07.2026; dismissal of criminal appeal for non-prosecution; appellant not pursuing matter or giving instructions; liberty to revive appeal within reasonable period; pending miscellaneous applications disposed of; bench: Vivek Singh Thakur and Ranjan Sharma, Judges; Kamal Sharma / Naresh K. Sharma for appellant; Jai Ram / Gaurav Gautam for respondent No.1; Yashwardhan Singh Chauhan / Sushant Keprate for respondent No.2-State.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the appellant to revive the appeal within a reasonable period if he intends to pursue the matter; pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand disposed of accordingly. ¶13

Vijay Kaushal Vs Narinder Kumar — Himachal Pradesh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

( 2026:HHC:29447 )

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

¶3

Cr. Appeal No. 57 of 2014 Date of Decision: 18.07.2026

Vijay Kaushal

....Appellant

Versus

Narinder Kumar & Anr.

¶8

....Respondents

¶9

Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge. Hon’ble Mr Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?¹

¶10

For the Appellant	:	Mr. Kamal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Naresh K. Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondents	:	Mr. Jai Ram, Advocate, vice Mr. Gaurav Gautam, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. Yashwardhan Singh Chauhan, Senior Additional Advocate General, with Mr. Sushant Keprate, Additional Advocate General, for respondent No.2- State.

¶11

Vivek Singh Thakur,Judge (oral)

¶12

Mr. Kamal Sharma, Advocate, under instructions from Mr. Naresh K. Sharma, Advocate, submits that the appellant is not coming forward to pursue the matter or to impart complete instructions and, therefore, it is not possible for the counsel to contest the appeal.

¶13

From the aforesaid submission, it appears that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the matter and, therefore, the present appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution, with liberty to the

¶14

Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

¶15

( 2026:HHC:29447 )

¶16

appellant to revive the same within reasonable period, if he really

¶17

intends to pursue the matter.

¶18

Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand

¶19

disposed of accordingly.

¶20

(Vivek Singh Thakur) (Judge)

¶21

(Ranjan Sharma) (Judge)

¶22

18^th July, 2026

¶23

(Shamsh Tabrez)

¶24

Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

Vijay Kaushal v. Narinder Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijay Kaushal v. Narinder Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Om Prakash Sharma Vs the State of Hp and Others

Jeet Singh Negi Vs State of Hp and Ors.

Sudhir Gupta Vs Income Tax Officer and Others

Piar Chand Vs State of Hp and Ors.

Ashok Kumar Vs the UOI and Others

Pooja Devi Vs State of Hp and Another