Dismissed¶18

Jeet Singh Negi v. State of Hp and Ors.

Himachal Pradesh HC17 Jul 2026CWP/5554/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Jeet Singh Negi v. State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors.; CWP No. 5554 of 2026; 2026:HHC:29354; High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla; decision date 17.07.2026; bench: Justice Vivek Singh Thakur (author) and Justice Ranjan Sharma; petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petition on same cause of action or avail appropriate remedy; pending applications disposed of; advocates: Ankit Dhiman (petitioner); Anup Rattan, Advocate General, and Ramakant Sharma, Additional Advocate General (respondents No. 1 to 3); Surinder Kumar Sharma, Senior Advocate, and Sidharth Negi (respondent No. 4).

What did the court decide?

Liberty to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action and/or to avail appropriate remedy under law, as prayed and unopposed. ¶18

Jeet Singh Negi Vs State of Hp and Ors. — Himachal Pradesh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

2026:HHC:29354

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

¶3

CWP No. 5554 of 2026 Date of decision: 17.07.2026

¶4

_____________________________________________________________________________ Jeet Singh Negi ...Petitioner.

¶5

Versus

¶6

State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors.

¶7

…Respondents.

¶8

Coram

¶9

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge.

¶10

Whether approved for reporting?¹

¶11

__________________________ For the Petitioner.	___________________________________________________ Mr. Ankit Dhiman, Advocate.
For the Respondents:	Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 to 3.
	Mr. Surinder Kumar Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sidharth Negi, Advocate, for respondent No. 4.

¶12

Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner, in view of subsequent events, seeks permission to withdraw this petition, with liberty to file fresh petition on the same cause of action and/or to avail appropriate remedy,

¶14

1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

¶15

CWP No. 5554 of 2026

¶16

2 2026:HHC:29354

¶17

as permissible under law, if so desired and required. Prayer has not been opposed.

¶18

In view of above, petition is dismissed as withdrawn with

¶19

liberty as prayed.

¶20

Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

¶21

(Vivek Singh Thakur), Judge.

¶22

(Ranjan Sharma),

¶23

Judge.

¶24

17^th July, 2026

¶25

(Susheel)

Jeet Singh Negi v. State of Hp and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jeet Singh Negi v. State of Hp and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amrender Singh Nagra and Anr. Vs State of Hp

M/S H.M. Steels Ltd. Vs Union of India and Others

Vishal Bansal Vs State of Hp

Om Prakash Sharma Vs the State of Hp and Others

Sudhir Gupta Vs Income Tax Officer and Others

Sudhir Gupta Vs Income Tax Officer and Others