Disposed¶16

Theon Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Amar Singh Bhatia and Another

Himachal Pradesh HC15 Jun 2026COPC/567/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Contempt proceedings closed and notices issued to the respondents discharged; petitioner reserved liberty to seek appropriate remedy for the redressal of its surviving grievances, if any, in accordance with law; pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand disposed of. ¶16

Theon Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Vs Amar Singh Bhatia and Another — Himachal Pradesh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶16

Issue for consideration

Whether, taking note of the compliance affidavit and the submissions made for the parties (including that the judgment in question now stands implemented), the present contempt proceedings should be closed.

¶16

Court's answer

Taking note of the compliance affidavit and the submissions made for the parties, the present contempt proceedings are closed and the notices issued to the respondents are discharged.

¶16

Ratio / Principle

The petitioner shall, however, be at liberty to seek appropriate remedy for the redressal of its surviving grievances, if any, in accordance with law.

¶16

Key takeaways

Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.ratio¶18

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla, COPC No.567 of 2026, decided on 15.06.2026 (Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge): Contempt proceedings by Theon Pharmaceuticals Ltd against respondents Amar Singh Bhatia and Anr were closed. Respondents' counsel reported that a compliance affidavit had been filed in the Registry, per which the petitioner's case was considered and rejected by the 21st Empowered Committee in its meeting convened on 06.05.2026. Petitioner's counsel submitted that, respondents having considered the petitioner's case, the judgment in question now stands implemented, and sought liberty to assail the respondents' decision in accordance with law. Taking note of the compliance affidavit and the submissions, the Court closed the contempt proceedings, discharged the notices issued to the respondents, and reserved to the petitioner liberty to seek appropriate remedy for the redressal of its surviving grievances, if any, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand disposed of.

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA

¶2

COPC No.567 of 2026 Decided on: 15.06.2026

¶3

_________________________________________________________________ Theon Pharmaceuticals Ltd ....Petitioner Versus Amar Singh Bhatia and Anr …Respondents ________________________________________________________________ Coram_

¶4

Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

¶5

1 Whether approved for reporting?

¶6

_________________________ For the petitioner:	_______________ Mr. Ajay Th	_____ akur,	____________________ Advocate.
For the respondents:	Mr. Nand Counsel.	Lal	Thakur, Sr. Panel

¶7

Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge

¶8

Learned counsel for the respondents submits that

¶9

compliance affidavit has been filed in the Registry of this Court. A copy whereof was made available for perusal. In terms of the compliance affidavit, case of the petitioner was considered and rejected by the 21^st Empowered Committee in its meeting convened on 06.05.2026.

¶10

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in

¶11

view of respondents’ having considered the case of the

¶12

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes

¶13

¶14

petitioner, the judgment in question now stands

¶15

implemented, however, liberty be reserved to the petitioner to assail the decision of the respondents in accordance with law.

¶16

3. Taking note of compliance affidavit as also the submissions made for the parties, present contempt proceedings are closed. Notices issued to the respondents are discharged. Petitioner, shall, however, be at liberty to seek appropriate remedy for the redressal of its surviving grievances, if any, in accordance with law.

¶17

Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also

¶18

stand disposed of.

¶19

Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge

¶20

June 15, 2026 R.Atal

Theon Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Amar Singh Bhatia and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Theon Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Amar Singh Bhatia and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bharti Kashyap Vs the State of Hp and Others

Amar Singh and Others Vs Rakesh Kanwar and Another

Ramesh Kumar Vs State of Hp and Others

State of Himachal Pradesh and another Vs Sat Pal

The Engineer in CHief Hppwd Nirman Bhawan Shimla Hp Vs Om Prakash

Shashank Minhas Vs Priyanka Basu Ingty and Another