Disposed¶11

Amar Singh and Others v. Rakesh Kanwar and Another

Himachal Pradesh HC5 Jun 2026COPC/455/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

COPC No.455 of 2026; contempt proceedings; Amar Singh and Ors v. Rakesh Kanwar and Anr.; High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla; Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua; compliance affidavit; office order dated 26.11.2024; contempt proceedings closed; notices discharged; liberty reserved to petitioners for surviving grievances; pending miscellaneous applications disposed of; decided 05.06.2026.

What did the court decide?

Contempt proceedings closed; notices issued to the respondents discharged; liberty reserved to the petitioners to seek appropriate remedy for any surviving grievances in accordance with law; pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, disposed of. ¶11

Amar Singh and Others Vs Rakesh Kanwar and Another — Himachal Pradesh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA

¶2

COPC No.455 of 2026 Decided on: 05.06.2026 _________________________________________________________________ Amar Singh and Ors ....Petitioners Versus Rakesh Kanwar and Anr. …Respondents ________________________________________________________________ Coram_

¶3

Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

¶4

1 Whether approved for reporting?

¶5

_________________________ For the petitioner:	________________________________________ Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Tarun K Sharma, Advocate.
For the respondents:	Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajat Chaudhary, Assistant Advocate General.

¶6

Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge

¶7

Learned Assistant Advocate General submits that compliance affidavit has been filed. Though, the same is not on record, however, a copy thereof was made available for perusal. In terms of the compliance affidavit, respondents have considered and decided the respective cases of the petitioners under office order dated 26.11.2024.

¶8

2. Taking note of the above documents, present

¶9

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes

¶10

¶11

contempt proceedings are closed. Notices issued to the respondents are discharged. Liberty however, is reserved to the petitioners to seek appropriate remedy for the redressal of their surviving grievances, if any, in accordance with law.

¶12

Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also

¶13

stand disposed of.

¶14

Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge

¶15

June 5, 2026 R.Atal

Amar Singh and Others v. Rakesh Kanwar and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amar Singh and Others v. Rakesh Kanwar and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prem Lal Vs the State of Hp and Another

Ashok Kumar Vs Abhishek Jain and Others

Sanjeev Kumar Vs Rakesh Kanwar and Anr.

Sunil Kumar and Others Vs Rakesh Kanwar and Another

Mohar Singh Vs the State of Hp and Others

Leela Dhar Vs Nipun Jindal